Introduction
In India, titles matter. They carry social respect, public recognition, and even influence how people perceive authority. Among the most admired is the title “Dr.,” usually associated with years of academic work or medical practice. However, when someone receives an Honorary Doctorate, a common question arises: Can they start using “Dr.” before their name? This question has caused confusion not only among recipients but also in public institutions, media, and professional spaces. In this blog, we examine what Indian academic norms and legal expectations say about using “Dr.” after receiving an honorary degree.
The Appeal and Ambiguity of the Title “Dr.”
The prefix “Dr.” is universally recognised and often associated with academic achievement, medical qualification, or scholarly contribution. In India, both medical doctors (MBBS/MD) and PhD holders (Doctor of Philosophy) use the title. However, the waters become less clear when it comes to Honorary Doctorates—degrees conferred without formal academic study, thesis, or examination.
Universities confer these honorary degrees with the intention to honour societal, cultural, or scientific contributions, not to certify academic expertise. And yet, after receiving the title, recipients are often introduced in events, media, or public forums as “Dr.” So, is it allowed? Or is it merely symbolic?
What UGC and Institutions Suggest
The University Grants Commission (UGC)—India’s apex regulatory body for higher education—recognises that honorary doctorates are valid ceremonial awards, but it draws a clear line on academic equivalence.
Key points to understand:
- The honorary doctorate does not qualify the recipient as an academic doctor.
- Recipients should not use “Dr.” in academic or professional settings where it may imply earned credentials.
- There is no legal bar on using “Dr.” in informal, public, or ceremonial settings, but it must be done responsibly and transparently.
Some universities include a clause stating that the recipient may be addressed as “Doctor” only when the term “honorary” is clearly understood. In short, using “Dr.” without context may not be illegal, but it can be ethically questionable, especially in academic or legal documents.
Best Practices: When and How to Use “Dr.” After an Honorary Degree
Here are some guidelines based on Indian academic customs:
✅ Acceptable Situations
- Public recognition at a cultural or ceremonial event
- Biographical mentions with a clarification, e.g., “Dr. (Honoris Causa)”
- In a list of awards or honors, not under “educational qualifications”
- Media coverage or interviews, with proper attribution
❌ Misleading or Risky Situations
- Job applications, resumes, or CVs without clarifying it’s honorary
- Claiming academic expertise in universities or teaching without earned degree
- Using “Dr.” in legal affidavits, ID cards, or professional registration forms
- Creating confusion about having an academic or medical doctorate
Several respected figures who have received honorary doctorates choose not to use the “Dr.” prefix, precisely to avoid confusion or controversy. This includes celebrities, public servants, and social reformers who value transparency over prestige.
Conclusion
While receiving an Honorary Doctorate is a significant mark of respect, using the title “Dr.” afterward is a matter of ethics, clarity, and responsible communication. In India, where educational titles carry formal weight, it is important not to blur the lines between honour and qualification.
If you choose to use “Dr.” after receiving an honorary doctorate, it is best to do so with clear context—ideally with the phrase “Honoris Causa” included or explained. The goal should be to honour the honour, not exploit it.
If you are unsure about the proper usage or have received an honorary degree and want to represent it responsibly, neutral guidance can help you make the right decision.