Introduction
For many Indian PhD scholars—especially those in private universities—getting a paper published in a reputed academic journal is both a milestone and a requirement. Yet, journal rejection remains a common hurdle. While some reasons are technical, many are avoidable with the right guidance. Understanding the specific causes of rejection can help you prepare and submit your article with greater clarity and confidence.
This blog breaks down the typical reasons why journal submissions are rejected and provides insight into how Indian scholars navigating doctoral admissions and thesis submission can avoid common pitfalls.
Lack of Original Contribution
Academic journals expect a paper to contribute something new to the existing body of knowledge. In the Indian academic context, especially in private institutions, scholars often replicate topics without refining their research questions. If your article reads like a summary of past work or appears too derivative, it risks quick rejection. Journals want to see that your work extends or challenges current knowledge—not just confirms it.To strengthen originality, frame your argument around a gap in the literature, and ensure your findings are not already widely known or published.
Weak Abstract and Title
Often underestimated, the title and abstract are the first checkpoints for editors. If your title is vague or doesn’t align with the journal’s theme, it may signal carelessness. Similarly, an abstract that fails to communicate the research problem, methodology, and key findings in a concise way can lead to immediate dismissal.
Many Indian researchers, especially first-time authors, write abstracts after completing the paper as an afterthought. Instead, it should be crafted strategically to highlight the value of the work and match journal expectations.
Poor Fit with the Journal’s Scope
Choosing the wrong journal is a surprisingly common reason for rejection. Each journal has a specific thematic focus and methodological preference. For example, submitting a qualitative education paper to a quantitatively inclined technology journal will likely end in rejection.
In Indian doctoral research, especially in interdisciplinary areas, it’s crucial to do background research on the journal’s past issues, its editorial board, and aims. Tailor your paper to fit that niche instead of assuming one format works everywhere.
Methodological Flaws
Methodology is often scrutinised by reviewers. Issues like poor sampling techniques, lack of clarity in variables, absence of justification for tools used, or inconsistent data analysis can weaken the credibility of a paper.In the Indian PhD context, where scholars may not always have access to statistical support or methodological training, these flaws can go unnoticed. Take support early—either from your guide, a research workshop, or an experienced peer—to ensure your methods are clearly presented and defendable.
Language and Presentation Issues
Grammar, sentence clarity, and structure matter. While academic English doesn’t have to be fancy, it must be precise. Many Indian scholars, especially those from non-English-medium backgrounds, struggle with writing fluency. However, journals expect international readability.
A paper full of typos, poorly structured paragraphs, or inconsistent referencing styles reflects poorly on the author. Before submission, have your draft reviewed by a language editor or someone proficient in academic writing.
Ignoring Journal Guidelines
Most journals provide detailed submission guidelines—word limits, referencing style, section order, and formatting rules. Overlooking these may appear disrespectful or unprofessional to editors.
This is particularly true for Indian researchers who may be more used to thesis formatting than journal structures. Always adapt your document format according to the target journal—not your university’s thesis model.
Ethical Oversights
Journals are increasingly strict about plagiarism, lack of informed consent, and improper authorship claims. Plagiarism—intentional or accidental—is a significant issue in Indian academic circles. Even paraphrased content without citation can be flagged.
Use reliable plagiarism checkers, be transparent about research permissions, and list only those who truly contributed. Avoid last-minute authorship inclusions just to satisfy institutional expectations.
Conclusion
Rejection, though discouraging, is not the end of the road—it’s often the beginning of refinement. By addressing issues like unclear contributions, poor language, mismatched journal choice, or ethical oversights, Indian PhD scholars can improve their chances significantly. Remember, journal publication is not just about effort; it’s also about alignment, clarity, and care.
Approach publishing as an ongoing learning process, and each feedback—even if it comes in the form of rejection—can guide you closer to success.